Beatty v. Clark

20 Cal. 11 ·

Supreme Court of California

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that a trustee’s authority to encumber trust property is strictly limited to the express purposes enumerated in the trust instrument, and that creditors who advance funds for purposes outside the trust’s scope acquire no priority over the designated beneficiaries, but may only assert claims against any residuary interest remaining after the trust’s specified obligations are satisfied.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.