Grattan v. Wiggins

23 Cal. 16 ·

Supreme Court of California

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that the statute of limitations barred foreclosure on all but the final two promissory notes secured by the mortgage, that the defense of the statute was available to subsequent grantees of the mortgaged property, and that the absence of a duly appointed administrator did not toll the running of the limitations period for the mortgagee's claims.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.