Abila v. Burnett

33 Cal. 658 ·

Supreme Court of California

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that a probate court may order the sale of real estate to pay an executor's expenses without first requiring a formal settlement and allowance of the executor's account, but such an order is premature if it fails to account for all available personal property of the estate, including assets that may have passed to a co-executor, before resorting to the realty.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.