Tracy v. Craig

55 Cal. 91 ·

Supreme Court of California

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that the trial court committed reversible error by excluding testimony that could have illuminated the central issue of whether a probate judge had an undisclosed, pre-confirmation interest in a sale of estate property, and by entering judgment for a defendant who had failed to properly deny a material allegation in the complaint.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.