Bell v. Hudson

73 Cal. 285 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed August 30, 1887

Published · citable Cited by 1

Holding

The court held that the equitable defense of laches barred the claim for an accounting of partnership assets and that the complaint failed to state any other viable cause of action concerning the co-tenancy of real property.

Cited by (1)

LEWIS EARL ROUSE, Individually and as Administrator, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. NORVELL B. UNDERWOOD et al., Defendants and Respondents (1966) 242 Cal. App. 2d 316