Bowden v. Pierce
73 Cal. 459 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 1
Holding
The court held that the defendant, who had been named as an executor but declined to qualify, did not act as a trustee for the estate and that a sale of estate assets by the acting executrix, though unconfirmed by the probate court, was valid and binding because it was made in good faith, for fair consideration, and in the best interest of the estate.
Cited by (1)
- ALBERN E. LAMKIN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MARGARET B. VIERRA et al., Defendants and Appellants (1961) 198 Cal. App. 2d 123