Bowden v. Pierce

73 Cal. 459 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable Cited by 1

Holding

The court held that the defendant, who had been named as an executor but declined to qualify, did not act as a trustee for the estate and that a sale of estate assets by the acting executrix, though unconfirmed by the probate court, was valid and binding because it was made in good faith, for fair consideration, and in the best interest of the estate.

Cited by (1)

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.