Butler v. Hyland
89 Cal. 575 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 1
Holding
The court held that a plaintiff’s testimony, if taken as true, was sufficient to establish an express trust in her favor and that the trial court erred in granting a nonsuit. The evidence demonstrated a confidential relationship between the parties, and the plaintiff’s delay in bringing suit did not constitute laches under the circumstances.
Cited by (1)
- BRADLEY BROS., INC., Appellant, v. GILES BRADLEY, Respondent (1912) 20 Cal. App. 1