Curtis v. Underwood
101 Cal. 661 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 1
Holding
The court held that the superior court properly acquired jurisdiction to probate the will of Weeden Underwood despite a procedural postponement of the hearing, that the service of notice upon the heirs was sufficient, and that the probate court’s decree of distribution was thus conclusive and not subject to collateral attack.
Statutes construed
- CCP § 1333
Cited by (1)
- GLADYS TORREGANO STEVENS, Appellant, v. ALFRED TORREGANO, Respondent (1961) 192 Cal. App. 2d 105