Boyce v. Fisk

110 Cal. 107 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that a mortgagee is entitled to collect the full rate of interest stipulated in a written contract, even if it is high, absent any showing of fraud, imposition, or other overreaching circumstances, but that a decree of foreclosure cannot operate to affirmatively vest title in the mortgagee for an outlawed debt.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.