Giselman v. Starr

106 Cal. 651 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable Cited by 1

Holding

The court held that the executors of S.C. Hastings’ estate held valid title to a note and mortgage, that an alleged gift of the instruments to a third party was legally ineffective for lack of delivery, and that the defendant-mortgagor’s statutory right to have an action prosecuted by the real party in interest was not violated where a judgment for the plaintiff would protect him from any future claims.

Cited by (1)

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.