Burling v. Newlands

112 Cal. 476 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that the complaint failed to state a cause of action for an accounting against the trustees of the Sharon estate because the plaintiffs failed to sufficiently allege they were creditors of the Ralston estate, the deed to Sharon did not create an express trust for the benefit of creditors, and the action was barred by the statute of limitations and the equitable doctrine of laches.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.