Burling v. Newlands
112 Cal. 476 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Holding
The court held that the complaint failed to state a cause of action for an accounting against the trustees of the Sharon estate because the plaintiffs failed to sufficiently allege they were creditors of the Ralston estate, the deed to Sharon did not create an express trust for the benefit of creditors, and the action was barred by the statute of limitations and the equitable doctrine of laches.
Statutes construed
- CIV ยง 8449