Dunn v. Schell

122 Cal. 626 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that a testamentary direction to keep property intact and undivided until a beneficiary reaches a specified age does not restrain a devisee’s power to mortgage their vested future interest in that property.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.