Dunn v. Schell
122 Cal. 626 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Holding
The court held that a testamentary direction to keep property intact and undivided until a beneficiary reaches a specified age does not restrain a devisee’s power to mortgage their vested future interest in that property.
Statutes construed
- CIV § 690
- CIV § 699