Toland v. Toland

123 Cal. 140 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed December 23, 1898

Published · citable Cited by 2

Holding

The court held that the testator’s will did not create an unlawful suspension of the power of alienation nor an invalid express trust in real property, and therefore the trial court erred in sustaining a demurrer to the defendants’ answer and striking their separate answer.

Statutes construed

CIV § 1324
CIV § 1326
CIV § 1645
CIV § 2220

Cited by (2)

In the Matter of the Estate of CHARLES B. INGRAM, Deceased; ESAU A. INGRAM et al., Appellants, v. GEORGE W. ADAMS et al., Respondents (1930) 104 Cal. App. 1
In re LEROY ELDRIDGE CLEAVER on Habeas Corpus; CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SOLANO COUNTY, Respondent; LEROY ELDRIDGE CLEAVER, Real Party in Interest. (1968) 266 Cal. App. 2d 143