Blankenship v. Whaley

124 Cal. 300 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that the trial court’s findings of fact were insufficient to support its judgment for the defendants because they omitted an essential finding on whether the defendants had knowledge of the plaintiff’s equitable interest in an irrigation ditch at the time they purchased the property at a probate sale.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.