Melone v. Ruffino
129 Cal. 514 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 1
Holding
The court held that in an action to recover a deposit made under a failed real estate contract, the burden of proving payment as an affirmative defense rests upon the defendant, not the plaintiff, and that the contractual authorization and receipt, though containing abbreviated property descriptions, were sufficiently intelligible and consistent to form an enforceable agreement.
Statutes construed
- CCP ยง 339
Cited by (1)
- A. B. DYER, Respondent, v. ROZENE M. MINTURN, Executrix, etc., et al., Appellants (1920) 47 Cal. App. 1