Thompson v. Staacke

131 Cal. 1 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed December 18, 1900

Published · citable Cited by 1

Holding

The court held that a probate court's order for a family allowance, even if potentially erroneous, is not void on its face and is therefore immune from collateral attack by creditors on the grounds of estate insolvency in a subsequent accounting proceeding.

Cited by (1)

Estate of VINCENT JAMES MURPHY, Deceased. MARY JUANITA MURPHY, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., Petitioner and Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, as Executor, etc., Objector and Respondent (1964) 225 Cal. App. 2d 224