Bemmerly v. Woodard
136 Cal. 326 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 2
Holding
The court held that the trial court did not err in finding that a testamentary trustee’s right to compensation commenced only after his duties as executor had terminated, rather than from the date of his appointment, and that the prior appellate decision’s mandate for modifying the judgment was properly executed.
Cited by (2)
- In the Matter of the Estate of HATTIE L. WARD, Deceased; BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST & SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Executor, etc., Respondent, v. ANGELUS CLOAK COMPANY et al., Appellants (1932) 127 Cal. App. 347
- Estate of MORRIS BUCKHANTZ, Deceased. FRIEDA DAVIDSON et al., Appellants, v. UNION BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF LOS ANGELES, as Executor, etc., et al., Respondents (1958) 159 Cal. App. 2d 635