Casey v. Gibbons

136 Cal. 368 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that a mortgagor who executes an instrument in which she personally agrees to pay a debt is a principal obligor, not a surety, and that the subsequent running of the statute of limitations on the underlying oral debt of a third-party beneficiary does not extinguish the written mortgage obligation.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.