Sohler v. Sohler
135 Cal. 323 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 2
Holding
The court held that a complaint alleging a conspiracy between an executrix and a third party to procure a fraudulent decree of distribution through extrinsic fraud stated a claim for equitable relief, but that the proper remedy was not to vacate the probate decree itself but to impose a constructive trust upon the wrongfully distributed property for the benefit of the defrauded heirs.
Cited by (2)
- R. PLATNAUER, Respondent, v. NETTIE L. FORNI et al., Appellants (1933) 131 Cal. App. 393
- GLADYS TORREGANO STEVENS, Appellant, v. ALFRED TORREGANO, Respondent (1961) 192 Cal. App. 2d 105