State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Superior Court of Sacramento Cty.
148 Cal. 55 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 3
Holding
The court held that the State of California lacked a sufficient, cognizable interest in the estate of Fritz Miller to appear as a contestant in the probate proceeding, as its claimed interest was based on a series of remote and contingent possibilities rather than a present or vested right.
Statutes construed
- CCP ยง 1271
Cited by (3)
- SAN DIEGO TRUST & SAVINGS BANK (a Corporation), as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. ANNA HEUSTIS, Appellant (1932) 121 Cal. App. 675
- In the Matter of the Estate of ALICE E. GARTHWAITE, Deceased; THE PEOPLE, Appellant, v. CITIZENS NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK OF LOS ANGELES (a National Banking Association), Executor, etc., et al., Respondents (1933) 131 Cal. App. 321
- Estate of GEORGE H. SANDY, Deceased. BANK OF CALIFORNIA, as Executor, etc., et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. ARTHUR T. CARLSON et al., Objectors and Appellants (1964) 230 Cal. App. 2d 309