Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. Monnier

169 Cal. 592 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable Cited by 1

Holding

The court held that a promissory note secured by a mortgage executed contemporaneously as part of a single transaction is non-negotiable, and that an attorney who obtains a financial advantage from a client in such a transaction bears the burden of proving the transaction was fair and for sufficient consideration under the presumption of undue influence codified in Civil Code section 2235.

Cited by (1)

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.