Miller v. Miller

171 Cal. 269 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed October 28, 1915

Published · citable Cited by 2

Holding

The court held that an action on a rejected contingent claim may not be maintained until after the happening of the contingency upon which the claim becomes due.

Cited by (2)

E. S. MERRILL, Respondent, v. HEROLD P. HARE, as Administrator, etc., Appellant (1934) 139 Cal. App. 462
DOROTHY M. NEWHALL, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RUTHIE M. NEWHALL, as Executrix, etc., Defendant and Appellant (1964) 227 Cal. App. 2d 800