Baxter v. Boege

173 Cal. 589 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that a judgment dismissing the action as to three respondents, while the case proceeded against other defendants, was a final and appealable judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 579, and that the plaintiff’s amended complaint failed to state a cause of action because it constituted an impermissible collateral attack on a probate court’s orders appointing an administrator and authorizing a conveyance of estate property.

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.