Hardiman v. Church
183 Cal. 585 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Holding
The court held that a proceeding on motion for a new trial, even if patently devoid of merit, qualifies as a valid proceeding under the Code of Civil Procedure, thereby triggering the extended thirty-day period for filing an appeal from the date the motion is denied rather than the standard sixty-day period from the entry of judgment.
Statutes construed
- CCP § 1312
- CCP § 1714
- CCP § 650
- CCP § 939