Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Alden
206 Cal. 592 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 6
Holding
The court held that a party who voluntarily complies with a court order for substitution and discharge of a stakeholder, and who subsequently amends its pleadings to omit that stakeholder, acquiesces in the order and waives any right to later challenge it on appeal.
Cited by (6)
- MAUD SCOTT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA COUNTY et al., Respondents (1932) 125 Cal. App. 513
- MICHAEL O'BRIEN, as Conservator, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JACK DUDENHOEFFER et al., Defendants and Respondents (1993) 16 Cal. App. 4th 327
- CHARLES J. GOTTESMAN et al., Appellants, v. HARRY E. SIMON, Respondent (1959) 169 Cal. App. 2d 494
- JOHN POAG et al., as Co-trustees, etc., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LAURA WINSTON, Defendant and Respondent (1987) 195 Cal. App. 3d 1161
- Estate of WILLIAM WALTZ, Deceased. DEL THURBER, Petitioner and Respondent, v. NINA M. MAXSEINER, Objector and Appellant (1966) 244 Cal. App. 2d 217
- EDWARD HSU et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MT. ZION HOSPITAL et al., Defendants and Respondents (1968) 259 Cal. App. 2d 562