Mitchell v. Dunn
211 Cal. 129 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 1
Holding
The court held that a defaulting trustee who commingles personal funds with dissipated trust funds in a guardianship account, and then purchases a specific asset from that account while subsequently depleting the remainder, cannot invoke the presumption that withdrawals were made from personal funds. The trustee holds the purchased property in trust for the beneficiary.
Cited by (1)
- JOHN DALAKIS, Respondent, v. CALIFORNIA PARAS, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Appellant (1948) 86 Cal. App. 2d 243