Bainbridge v. Stoner

16 Cal. 2d 423 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable Cited by 3

Holding

The court held that a complaint by minority shareholders, alleging a corporate president fraudulently executed on corporate assets to acquire them for himself, was barred by the statute of limitations and insufficiently pleaded to excuse the delay, as the public record of the underlying litigation and conveyances provided constructive notice of the wrongdoing more than three years before the action was filed.

Cited by (3)

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.