Dobbins v. Title Guarantee & Tr. Co.
22 Cal. 2d 64 ·
Supreme Court of California · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 1
Holding
The court held that a probate court's final order, which allowed an extraordinary fee solely to one co-executor, constituted a conclusive judicial apportionment of that compensation and was therefore res judicata on the issue of how the fee was to be divided between the fiduciaries, barring a subsequent civil action by the excluded co-executor to claim a share based on a private agreement.
Statutes construed
- PROB ยง 931
Cited by (1)
- ROBERT E. HATCH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. STANLEY F. BUSH et al., Defendants and Respondents (1963) 215 Cal. App. 2d 692