Maud v. Catherwood
67 Cal. App. 2d 636 ·
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 4
Holding
The court held that the trust corpus must be distributed to the then-living lineal descendants of the trustor per stirpes, not per capita, meaning division occurs at the level of the trustor’s children, with descendants of deceased children taking their parent’s share by right of representation.
Statutes construed
- CIV § 1403
- PROB § 221
- PROB § 222
- PROB § 250
- PROB § 252
Cited by (4)
- Estate of SAMUEL BERK, Deceased. HERBERT L. FREED, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. DAVID J. BERKOWITZ, Respondent (1961) 196 Cal. App. 2d 278
- Estate of ANNA EDWARDS, Deceased. SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL BANK, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID E. AGNEW et al., Defendants and Appellants. PATRICIA R. FOUBERT et al., Defendants and Respondents (1988) 203 Cal. App. 3d 1366
- MARY NICKEL LOMBARDI, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. MARSDEN S. BLOIS, as Trustee, etc., et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Respondents; MARSDEN S. BLOIS, as Trustee, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MARY NICKEL LOMBARDI et al., Defendants and Appellants (1964) 230 Cal. App. 2d 191
- Estate of VICTORIA A. McKENZIE, Deceased. UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK, Petitioner and Respondent, v. MARGARET IVES LEONARD et al., Objectors and Appellants (1966) 246 Cal. App. 2d 740