Blair v. Mahon
104 Cal. App. 2d 44 ·
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 4
Holding
The court held that the second amended complaint alleged sufficient facts to state a cause of action for imposition of a constructive trust, as the defendant-executrix breached her fiduciary duties through fraudulent concealment of material facts from a minor legatee deployed to combat, and that the action was not barred by the statute of limitations.
Statutes construed
- CIV § 2217
- CIV § 2223
- CIV § 2224
- CIV § 2228
- CIV § 2229
- CIV § 2237
- CIV § 2243
Cited by (4)
- TAMMY CABRAL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MARY L. SOARES, Individually and as Executor, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents (2007) 157 Cal. App. 4th 1234
- GLADYS TORREGANO STEVENS, Appellant, v. ALFRED TORREGANO, Respondent (1961) 192 Cal. App. 2d 105
- WALTER D. RANSOM et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MARIAN S. RANSOM, Individually and as Administratrix, etc., Defendant and Respondent (1963) 215 Cal. App. 2d 258
- MARJORIE LUDWICKI, Plaintiff and Appellant v. BRUCE GUERIN, Individually and as Executor, etc., Defendant and Respondent (1961) 57 Cal. 2d 127