Hume v. Lacey
112 Cal. App. 2d 147 ·
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 2
Holding
The court held that an action for personal injuries against a decedent’s estate was properly brought against the administrator in his representative capacity, that the cause of action survived the tortfeasor’s death under the applicable statutory scheme, and that the trial court correctly excluded evidence of the plaintiff’s pension benefits when calculating damages for loss of earning capacity.
Cited by (2)
- GEORGE RICHARD PLUMLEE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JOHN POAG et al., Defendants and Respondents (1984) 150 Cal. App. 3d 541
- HELEN RACZYNSKI, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN E. JUDGE, as Executor and Trustee, etc., Defendant and Appellant (1986) 186 Cal. App. 3d 504