de Laguna Spaulding v. Jones
117 Cal. App. 2d 541 ·
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 1
Holding
The court held that the trial court did not err in finding no express trust existed over the disputed real property, as the plaintiff's oral testimony failed to meet the clear and convincing evidentiary standard required to contradict the absolute terms of multiple warranty deeds, and that the defenses of laches and the statute of limitations barred the claim.
Statutes construed
- CCP § 338
- CIV § 1040
Cited by (1)
- In re the Marriage of JUDY and CLARENCE HAINES. JUDY A. HAINES, Appellant, v. CLARENCE HAINES, Respondent (1995) 33 Cal. App. 4th 277