Stoner v. Laidley
118 Cal. App. 2d 50 ·
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Published · citable
Holding
The court held that the plaintiff, having acquired legal title to the disputed properties through a series of valid inter vivos transfers, successfully rebutted the presumption of undue influence arising from a confidential relationship by demonstrating the grantor acted upon independent advice, received adequate consideration, and understood the transactions, and further, that the defendant's claims were barred by laches and statutes of limitation.