Estate of CHARLES CHRISTIAN NEILSON, Deceased. HAZEL DeBOER et al., Claimants and Appellants, v. INES B. NEILSON, Claimant and Respondent

57 Cal. 2d 733 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed

Published · citable Cited by 6

Holding

The court held that the longstanding rule of Estate of Pepper, which held that all income from a husband’s separate agricultural property was his separate property regardless of his labor, was irreconcilable with the apportionment doctrine established in *Pereira v. Pereira* and was therefore overruled.

Cited by (6)

Source: cap_files. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.