Rader v. Thrasher

57 Cal. 2d 244 ·

Supreme Court of California · Filed January 25, 1962

Published · citable Cited by 3

Holding

The court held that the trial court erred in failing to make a finding on the adequacy of consideration for a contingent fee agreement executed during an ongoing attorney-client relationship, as required by Civil Code section 2235, and reversed the judgment for this failure.

Statutes construed

CCP § 1859
CCP § 1963
CIV § 2235

Cited by (3)

In re the Marriage of JANET E. and RONALD W. BURKLE. JANET E. BURKLE, Appellant, v. RONALD W. BURKLE, Respondent (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 712
R. THOMAS FAIR, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. KARL E. BAKHTIARI et al., Defendants and Respondents; KARL E. BAKHTIARI et al., Plaintiffs, v. R. THOMAS FAIR, Defendant (2011) 195 Cal. App. 4th 1135
In re the Marriage of JUDY and CLARENCE HAINES. JUDY A. HAINES, Appellant, v. CLARENCE HAINES, Respondent (1995) 33 Cal. App. 4th 277