Jay v. Superior Court
10 Cal. App. 3d 754 ·
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 3
Holding
The court held that an individual designated as an executor in a will, but who is neither an heir, devisee, nor legatee, lacks standing as a “person interested” under Probate Code section 370 to contest a subsequent codicil that replaces him as executor but leaves all dispositive provisions of the estate unchanged.
Statutes construed
- PROB § 370
Cited by (3)
- EDWARD BENNETT GREGGE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MICHAEL HUGILL, as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Respondent (2016) 1 Cal. App. 5th 561
- Estate of PIERRE BAIRD, Deceased. EMILY BAIRD, as Executrix, etc., Petitioner and Respondent, v. VIOLET DuFRIEND, Claimant and Appellant (1987) 196 Cal. App. 3d 957
- Estate of SONIA SOBOL, Deceased. TERRY D. SHAYLIN, as Co-executor, etc., et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. JAY ROSE et al., Objectors and Appellants (2014) 225 Cal. App. 4th 771