Estate of MARY McBRYDE FEENEY, Deceased. PATRICK FORD, Petitioner and Respondent, v. LUCILLE J. BOSTON, as Executrix, etc., Objector and Appellant; BARBARA FORD et al., Claimants and Respondents
139 Cal. App. 3d 812 ·
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 2
Holding
The court held that the trial court abused its discretion in removing the executrix under Probate Code section 521 for mismanagement, as the findings did not establish a sufficient conflict of interest to justify removal under the court’s inherent power or demonstrate the serious malfeasance required by statute.
Statutes construed
- PROB § 1240
- PROB § 466
- PROB § 521
- PROB § 758
Cited by (2)
- SANDRA FERRARO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SUSAN CAMARLINGHI et al., Defendants and Respondents (2008) 161 Cal. App. 4th 509
- ESTATE OF Roscoe SAPP, Sr., Deceased. Armuress Sapp et al., Petitioners and Respondents, v. Edith Rogers, Objector and Appellant. (2019) 248 Cal. Rptr. 3d 244