IFS INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DALE J. STEPHENS et al., Defendants and Appellants
159 Cal. App. 3d 740 · 29548
California Court of Appeal · Filed
Holding
The court held that the trial court’s order removing trustees was not an appealable interlocutory order but that the circumstances warranted treating the appeal as a petition for writ of mandate, and further held that the petitioner-mortuary had standing as a beneficiary to seek removal of trustees but that the summary removal procedure employed deprived the trustees of due process.
Statutes construed
- BPC § 7615
- BPC § 7735
- CCP § 307
- CCP § 437c
- PROB § 1138.12
- PROB § 1138.6
Cited by (2)
- Trolan v. Trolan (2019) 243 Cal. Rptr. 3d 264
- DONALD PAUL CHRISTENSEN et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; PASADENA CREMATORIUM OF ALTADENA et al., Real Parties in Interest (1991) 54 Cal. 3d 868