Hagen v. Hickenbottom
41 Cal. App. 4th 168 · H012841
California Court of Appeal, Sixth Appellate District · Filed
Published · citable
Cited by 3
Holding
The court held that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment based on the defense of truth, as the defendant failed to establish that her allegedly influential statements were privileged truthful communications rather than the very mechanism of undue influence in a confidential relationship.
Statutes construed
- CCP § 2030
- CCP § 437c
- CIV § 44
Cited by (3)
- SUSAN DAVID, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WENDY ALTER HERMANN, Individually and as Trustee, etc., Defendant and Appellant (2005) 129 Cal. App. 4th 672
- BRENT BECKWITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SUSAN DAHL, Defendant and Respondent (2012) 205 Cal. App. 4th 1039
- SUSAN D. LINTZ et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. LOIS LYNNE LINTZ, Defendant and Appellant (2014) 222 Cal. App. 4th 1346