MARK W. IKE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. G. ARNOLD DOOLITTLE, Defendant and Respondent; SAM ARNOLD et al., Defendants and Appellants

61 Cal. App. 4th 51 · D026752

California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District · Filed

Published · citable Cited by 9 Cites 6

Holding

The court held that the trial court correctly identified patent ambiguities within a complex inter vivos trust and a contemporaneous property agreement, properly admitted extrinsic evidence to ascertain the trustors' intent, and did not err in reforming the instrument to effectuate that intent and ensure the separate distribution of each trustor's estate to their designated beneficiaries.

Cited by (9)

Authorities cited (6)

Source: static.case.law. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.