Keading v. Keading
A151468
California Court of Appeal, First Appellate District · Filed
Published · citable
Holding
The court held that substantial evidence supported the trial court’s finding that Kenton Keading committed elder financial abuse through undue influence, that Probate Code § 859 authorizes double damages for such abuse without a separate bad‑faith finding, that Hilja Keading possessed standing as an “interested person” under Welfare & Institutions Code § 15657.3 and Probate Code § 48, and that the appellate challenges to the attachment order and the anti‑SLAPP dismissal were without merit. ---
Statutes construed
- CCP § 425.16
- CCP § 482.010
- CCP § 485.220
- EVID § 452
- EVID § 664
- PROB § 48
- PROB § 859
- WIC § 15600
- WIC § 15657.3