M.M. v. D.V.

Holding

The court held that, even assuming the appellant qualifies as a “presumed parent” under the constitutional framework of *Kelsey S.*, the trial court did not err in denying his petition to be adjudged a third parent because substantial evidence showed he had no existing parent‑child relationship with the child, and therefore recognizing only two parents would not be detrimental to the child under Family Code § 7612(c). ---