Pearce v. Briggs
F080403
California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District · Filed
Published · citable
Holding
The court held that Ruth L. Briggs’ estate possessed no vested interest in either the Gibson or Rosedale parcels, that the Pearce parties’ real‑property claims were barred by the applicable statutes of limitation, and therefore the trial court’s denial of the Pearce petition and grant of the Briggs petition were affirmed. ---
Statutes construed
- CCP § 318
- CCP § 321
- CCP § 325
- CCP § 338
- CIV § 683.2
- CORP § 16501
- CORP § 16502
- CORP § 16503
- EVID § 622
- EVID § 662
- FAM § 760
- FAM § 770
- FAM § 852
- PROB § 210
- PROB § 21105
- PROB § 6120
- PROB § 6600
- PROB § 859