Gann v. Acosta
F080831
California Court of Appeal, Fifth Appellate District · Filed
Published · citable
Holding
The court held that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR) interpretation of “step‑parent” in its regulations was not clearly unreasonable, and therefore the agency’s denial of the inmate’s request for an overnight family visit was proper. Accordingly, the superior court’s denial of the traditional mandamus petition was affirmed. ---
Statutes construed
- CCP § 1084
- CCP § 1085
- CCP § 1094.5
- FAM § 3101
- GOV § 12838.5
- GOV § 6250
- HSC § 11014.5
- PEN § 187
- PEN § 2602
- PEN § 311
- PEN § 5050
- PEN § 5054
- PEN § 5055
- PEN § 5058
- PEN § 6404
- PEN § 76
- PROB § 3200
- WIC § 903