Godoy v. Linzner

B330725

California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District · Filed

Published · citable

Holding

The court held that the 2019 amendment, which limited each sibling’s ability to sell his or her one‑third interest in the family residence to a fixed price of $100,000 and only to the other siblings, constituted an unreasonable restraint on alienation in violation of Civil Code § 711; consequently, the amendment was void and the 2018 restatement of the trust remained controlling. ---

Source: courtlistener_api. Verify against the official reporter before relying on this text.